Resident doctors

Many doctors now describe feeling undervalued, overextended, and left without meaningful avenues for redress. Industrial action is never undertaken lightly by healthcare professionals. It reflects a breakdown in dialogue and a growing sense that core concerns — particularly around pay restoration, working conditions, and workforce retention — are not being adequately addressed. While DAUK fully acknowledges public concern over service disruption, we emphasise the greatest threat to patient care remains long-term understaffing and the continued loss of skilled clinicians from the NHS. The current pay dispute must therefore be viewed in the context of wider system fragility.

Workforce sustainability

Remuneration is not simply a contractual issue — it is an essential lever for workforce sustainability. Without urgent and credible action to address this, the health service risks further attrition, diminished training environments, and declining safety standards. DAUK urges the government to re-engage with seriousness and transparency. There remains a clear opportunity to prevent further disruption through an early and substantive offer that demonstrates both recognition and respect for resident doctors’ contributions.

Constructive resolution

DAUK continues to support constructive resolution, rooted in professional solidarity, patient safety, and systemic reform. We stand with our colleagues on the frontline and remain committed to advocating for an NHS that is fair to those who work in it and safe for those who depend upon it.

Please support our work by joining DAUK or donating to our GoFundMe.

Dr Taylor, GP spokesperson for the Doctors’ Association UK (DAUK), said general practice had been underfunded for the past 10 to 15 years.

Speaking on national radio, he said that GPs were doing more work than ever for less pay and that the vote was a signal that something needed to change.

During an interview on Times Radio Breakfast, Dr Taylor said: “You have to see this (vote) in the context of a longer term problem.

“Over the last eight or nine years we have lost around 20 per cent funding, per pound per patient.

“We do understand the pressures that are there.

“All GPs are also patients. I’ve been number 35 in the queue to see my own GP.

“But effectively GPs have been providing a lot of extra activity over the last four or five years. They’re actually doing 20 per cent more work than they were in 2019.

“It’s probably the only area of the NHS that’s doing more than it was four or five years ago.”

In a ballot run by the British Medical Association (BMA), 98 per cent of GPs  voted in favour of taking collective action in protest at the previous government increasing their budget by only 1.9 per cent this year.

Industrial action

GP partners will choose what form of industrial action to take from a series of measures, including limiting patient contacts to a maximum of 25 people per GP per day.

Dr Taylor said: “Fundamentally this is about patient care.

“We as GPs want to provide care for patients.

“For the last 14 years we haven’t had enough funding to make practices work.”

Dr Taylor said the government was already making ‘positive sounds’ about funding for GP practices.

“GPs had a ballot at the beginning of the year where 99.3 per cent of GPs rejected the 1.9 per cent (funding increase),” he said.

“With that 1.9 per cent, the government are talking about 6 per cent in the coming year.

“And they announced they’re trying to release a pot of funding to employ GPs.

“So it’s not all negative.”

Patient care

Dr Taylor expanded on the ballot result and subsequent industrial action during an interview with John Pienaar on Times Radio Drive.

“The safe number of GP appointments has been considered for some time to be around 25 to 30,” Dr Taylor said.

“As a partner, I was doing 40 to 50 appointments a day. I nearly got burnt out by that and it’s one of the reasons I’m no longer a partner. I couldn’t do it anymore.

“Some of my younger colleagues are struggling with the amount of work.

“This will restrict the number of appointments available, but if those appointments are with a stressed out GP who is rushing between a patient then it’s probably not going to be as good as if you had a 15-minute appointment with a GP who is focused.

“We need to protect GPs at work and we need to protect patient care,” he added.

Become a member of DAUK and support our work.