{"id":1462,"date":"2025-12-05T15:37:19","date_gmt":"2025-12-05T15:37:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/gp-contract-discussions\/"},"modified":"2025-12-05T15:37:19","modified_gmt":"2025-12-05T15:37:19","slug":"gp-contract-discussions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/gp-contract-discussions\/","title":{"rendered":"Significant concerns over expansion of GP contract discussions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">DAUK has written to NHS England to express \u2018significant concerns\u2019 about the expansion of groups involved in GP contract discussions.\r\n\r\nIn a letter to Dr Amanda Doyle, NHS England\u2019s primary care director, DAUK has given its full support to the BMA GP Committee England (BMA GPC).\r\n\r\nThe letter states the BMA GPC, as the trade union that has held the statutory right to negotiate GP contracts since the foundation of the NHS, should remain the exclusive negotiator when it comes to the terms under which GPs work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">GP contract discussions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It follows an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pulsetoday.co.uk\/news\/breaking-news\/bma-set-to-lose-exclusive-gp-contract-negotiating-role-in-england\/\">announcement by Dr Doyle<\/a> that the groups consulted on changes to the contract would be expanded. This would significantly dilute the BMA\u2019s role.\r\n\r\nAlongside the BMA GPC, the RCGP, the National Association of Primary Care, Healthwatch England, National Voices, and the NHS Confederation would also be consulted.\r\n\r\nDr Steve Taylor, DAUK GP co-lead, said: \u201cWe wanted to make it clear that the BMA is the correct and legally-established organisation to negotiate the GP contract.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">High-quality care<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt is best placed to ensure the contract is workable for GPs and delivers safe, high-quality care for patients.\u201d\r\n\r\nDr Taylor noted that the Royal College of GPs (RCGP) has stated that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pulsetoday.co.uk\/news\/contract\/not-our-role-to-negotiate-gp-contract-says-rcgp\/\">GP contract negotiations are not their role<\/a>.\r\n\r\nIn the letter, DAUK stressed that constructive evidence from across the system should inform any new contract.\r\n\r\nDAUK has published <em><a href=\"https:\/\/dauk.org\/our-call-for-new-patient-centred-gp-contract\/\">Your GP, here for you<\/a><\/em>, a modern patient-centred GP contract designed to strengthen continuity, improve access, and ensure GP services are properly funded.\r\n\r\nThe document was written after consultation with GPs, health leaders and the public. It builds on the 2022 cross-party Health and Social Care Committee review <em>The Future of General Practice<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Your GP, here for you<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Your GP, here for you <\/em>has quickly gained the support of many GP leaders, the public, and health leaders.\r\n\r\nDr Taylor said: \u201cWe\u2019ve already been consulting widely. It\u2019s vital that the full range of available evidence is used.\u201d\r\n\r\nHe added: \u201cWe want to see contracts that reflect the realities of general practice, not compromises forced through around a diluted table.\u201d\r\n\r\nRead the letter in full below.\r\n\r\nAll of our committee members are volunteers. They speak to the media and campaign on the issues facing doctors in their own time. Please support their work by <a href=\"https:\/\/dauk.org\/membership\/\">joining DAUK<\/a> or donating to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gofundme.com\/f\/support-the-work-of-the-doctors-association-uk-dauk\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">our GoFundMe<\/a>.\r\n\r\n[pdf-embedder url=&#8221;https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/New_NHSE_GP_contract_could_lead_to_more_practice_closures.pdf&#8221; title=&#8221;New_NHSE_GP_contract_letter&#8221;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DAUK has written to NHS England to express \u2018significant concerns\u2019 about the expansion of groups involved in GP contract discussions. In a letter to Dr&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1477,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,59],"tags":[304,591,327],"class_list":["post-1462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-dauk-news","category-general-practice","tag-gp-committee","tag-gp-contract","tag-nhse"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1462\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1477"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dauk.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}