DAUK\u2019s concerns over proposals in the Government\u2019s new Health Bill to enable the creation of a Single Patient Record have been reported in GP Online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Dr Sarah Jacques, GP co-lead for the Doctors\u2019 Association UK, warned the plan risked undermining patient confidentiality, professional accountability, and public trust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Speaking to GP Online<\/a>, Dr Jacques said that while GPs broadly support better communication and appropriate information sharing across the NHS, the current proposals appear to extend beyond improving patient care.<\/p>\n\n\n\n She said: \u201cIn principle, I believe GPs support better communication and appropriate information sharing across the NHS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cHowever, the current proposals appear to go far beyond improving direct clinical care and raise serious unanswered questions about confidentiality, governance, liability, transparency, and public trust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI think one of the biggest concerns is around the GP data controller role. Yet there has been very little clarity about what happens to those responsibilities under the single patient record model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cGPs need to know whether they will still retain legal and professional liability for information that may ultimately be shared more widely or potentially altered by external organisations and providers.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n DAUK\u2019s concerns around the Health Bill and the creation of a Single Patient Record have also been reported in Pulse Today<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We are a non-profit campaigning and lobbying organisation led by frontline doctors, for frontline doctors. We are volunteers and our collective aim is to give frontline workers a voice to be heard.<\/p>\n\n\n\nSerious unanswered questions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Health Bill<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n